Get help today
Is home education a safeguarding concern?
No, not on its own. This is not a reassurance the KB is adding; it is the explicit position of the two pieces of statutory guidance that govern how English local authorities handle home education and how they handle safeguarding.
The Department for Education's 2019 Elective Home Education: Departmental Guidance for Local Authorities states that the fact that a child is being home-educated is not, by itself, a reason for a safeguarding referral. Working Together to Safeguard Children (the statutory safeguarding guidance, most recent version 2023) sets the threshold for statutory intervention at "reasonable cause to suspect that a child is suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm". Home education does not meet that threshold by itself, and Working Together does not list home education among the risk factors for concern.
This matters because a referral grounded only in the fact of home education is improperly grounded, and a specialist charity like Family Rights Group will say so on the phone to you in a way that is useful when you come to respond.
That said, home-educating families are not exempt from the child-protection system. If a specific concern exists (an injury, a disclosure, a named allegation), the system applies in the ordinary way. The point is not that home-ed families are outside safeguarding; the point is that the method of education is not, by itself, a trigger.
What are my rights?
Specific and important. Know them before you speak to anyone.
The right to know the allegation, in general terms at least. You are entitled to be told what the concern is. "We've had a referral" with no detail is not a complete response; ask what the concern is about.
The right to have a support person with you at any meeting. This can be a partner, a relative, a friend, a professional advocate or a solicitor. You do not have to meet alone.
The right not to be interviewed without legal advice in any serious enquiry. You can politely ask for the interview to be delayed while you take advice. In non-emergency cases this is a reasonable request that most social workers will accommodate.
The right to see documents that will be used in any formal meeting (Section 47 assessment, Child Protection conference). Ask for them in writing in advance.
The right to challenge inaccurate information. If a document misrepresents facts about your family, say so in writing, on the record.
The right to complain if a social worker acts improperly. The local authority has a complaints process; Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is the escalation route.
What does "engage, do not hide" actually mean?
It means answering the door politely, taking the letter seriously, making the calls, attending the meetings, but doing all of that with advice from Family Rights Group and where appropriate a solicitor.
Hiding (not answering correspondence, refusing all contact, disappearing) tends to escalate the case. Engaging politely, with a support person present and notes taken, tends to de-escalate it. Social workers read refusal-of-contact as a concern; they read considered, calm, documented engagement as reassurance, even when you are declining specific requests.
What engagement does not mean is surrendering your rights. You can be cooperative and still decline to let a social worker into your home on the first visit, still ask for a meeting to be at the local authority office rather than at home, still decline to be interviewed without legal advice. The tone is polite and the substance is careful.
What do you actually do in the first 48 hours?
Five things, in this order.
- Contact Family Rights Group (frg.org.uk). They will help you read the letter or message, work out what stage the process is at and plan the next move. Do this before you write or say anything substantive to the local authority.
- Keep the letter or message and make notes. Save the email; print the letter; note the date and time of any phone call with the social worker's name, number and what was said. These notes are the backbone of any later correspondence.
- Identify a support person who can attend meetings with you: a partner, a trusted friend, a Family Rights Group-trained advocate, a solicitor for serious cases.
- Decide on immediate practical changes only with advice. Do not cancel therapies, move the child to relatives or send a conciliatory email before the Family Rights Group call. Small well-meant actions can be misread.
- If Section 47 or a Child Protection conference is named, get a solicitor the same day. Legal aid is often available for parents in Section 47 enquiries and Child Protection conferences. The earlier a solicitor is involved, the better the eventual outcome.
A real family's first week
A family we will call the Nwosus received a letter from their council naming a Section 17 enquiry (voluntary family support, not a Section 47 child-protection enquiry) the morning after a neighbour had reported a shouted argument in the garden and had mentioned in passing that the children were home-educated.
They rang Family Rights Group on the Thursday the letter arrived. Family Rights Group walked them through what a Section 17 is (voluntary, not compelling entry or interview), what it is not (a Section 47 enquiry) and what a calm reply would look like. The Nwosus wrote a one-page reply on the Friday acknowledging the enquiry, providing a short factual description of the family and declining a home visit in favour of a meeting at the council office.
The council office meeting happened the following Wednesday. Both parents attended; Family Rights Group had given them talking points; the social worker was reasonable; the meeting lasted forty-five minutes; the social worker concluded there was no safeguarding concern and closed the case.
The Nwosus kept a typed summary of the meeting the same evening, in case the notes were needed later. They were not. The whole process took ten days.
This is a median outcome for a Section 17 enquiry following a neighbour referral. Section 47 enquiries are more serious and more complex; the instruction to engage, take specialist advice and know your rights still applies.
What if a Child Protection conference is called?
Then the referral has progressed beyond a Section 47 enquiry and the local authority is considering whether the child should be placed on a Child Protection plan. This is the serious end of the process.
At this stage, a solicitor is not optional. Legal aid is available for parents whose child is the subject of a Child Protection conference. Family Rights Group will signpost to family law solicitors who specialise in child-protection work.
You are entitled to see the local authority's conference report in advance (usually three working days before the conference, sometimes longer). Read it carefully. Note any factual inaccuracies and raise them in writing before the conference. Bring a support person to the conference itself. Speak when invited to; be factual and specific; do not be defensive or argumentative. The conference is a shared decision-making meeting, not a trial.
Outcomes of a Child Protection conference are: no plan (the case closes or stays at Child in Need status); a Child Protection plan (with a core group and a named lead social worker); in rare cases, legal proceedings. All of these have specific processes that Family Rights Group and your solicitor will guide you through.
This article is information, not legal advice. Safeguarding referrals progress quickly. Ring Family Rights Group the day a letter arrives and instruct a family law solicitor as soon as Section 47 or a Child Protection conference is mentioned.
Frequently asked.
- Is home education itself a safeguarding concern?
- No. The statutory safeguarding guidance for England (Working Together to Safeguard Children, most recent 2023 edition) and the 2019 DfE EHE guidance both say explicitly that home education is not on its own a safeguarding concern. A referral that rests solely on the fact of home education is improperly grounded.
- Who makes safeguarding referrals?
- Anyone can. Schools, health visitors, GPs, neighbours, relatives, ex-partners, members of the public. Referrals can be made in good faith, in error or (rarely) maliciously. The quality of the underlying concern matters more than who made it.
- What is a Section 47 enquiry?
- An enquiry under Section 47 of the Children Act 1989, which a local authority is required to make if it has reasonable cause to suspect that a child in its area is suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm. A Section 47 enquiry is the serious end of the process. If you receive a letter naming Section 47, get a family law solicitor today.
- Do I have to let a social worker into my home?
- Not as a general rule. You can agree to meet at a neutral venue or on a video call. If a social worker arrives at your door unannounced, you can be polite, ask for identification, ask for their reason for attending and decline entry while you contact a solicitor. Refusing entry is not, on its own, evidence of harm.
- Should my child be interviewed without me or without legal advice?
- Almost never. Children have the right to be heard in proceedings that concern them but that does not mean they should be interviewed alone or without preparation. Ask for the interview to be delayed until you have taken legal advice; in most non-emergency cases this is a reasonable request.
- What if a Child Protection conference is called?
- A Child Protection conference is serious and you are entitled to representation. Ring Family Rights Group and a family law solicitor the day the conference is scheduled. You have the right to see the local authority's documents, to bring a support person, to speak to the conference and to challenge inaccurate information.